[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

September, 2006 - WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive by thread

• Order attribute for lists Barry (Saturday, 30 September)
  • Re: Order attribute for lists Lachlan Hunt (Saturday, 30 September)
    • Re: Order attribute for lists Barry (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [WSG] Textarea attribues. Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 29 September)
• FYI: application/www-form-urlencoded Bjoern Hoehrmann (Thursday, 28 September)
• Semantics scope of blockquote Karl Dubost (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: Sizing David Woolley (Tuesday, 26 September)
• XHTML-Print es a W3C Recommendation Steven Pemberton (Tuesday, 26 September)
• tags vs elements (was: Re: [ot] Re: [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag) Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 25 September)
  • Re: tags vs elements (was: Re: [ot] Re: [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag) Mark Birbeck (Monday, 25 September)
    • Re: tags vs elements (was: Re: [ot] Re: [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag) Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 25 September)
  • Re: tags vs elements (was: Re: [ot] Re: [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag) Jens Meiert (Monday, 25 September)
• [Moderator Action] [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag David Latapie (Monday, 25 September)
  • Re: [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 25 September)
    • [Moderator Action] Re: [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag David Latapie (Monday, 25 September)
      • Re: [Moderator Action] Re: [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag Jonathan Worent (Tuesday, 26 September)
      • Re: [Moderator Action] Re: [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag Orion Adrian (Tuesday, 26 September)
      • Re: [Moderator Action] Re: [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag David Latapie (Tuesday, 26 September)
    • Re: [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag Jukka K. Korpela (Monday, 25 September)
• Some comments on the current draft Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis (Saturday, 23 September)
  • Re: Some comments on the current draft Jim Jewett (Sunday, 24 September)
  • Re: Some comments on the current draft Laurie Voss (Sunday, 24 September)
    • Re: Some comments on the current draft David Woolley (Sunday, 24 September)
    • Re: Some comments on the current draft Karl Dubost (Tuesday, 26 September)
      • Re: Some comments on the current draft David Woolley (Tuesday, 26 September)
  • Re: Some comments on the current draft Karl Dubost (Saturday, 23 September)
  • Re: Some comments on the current draft David Latapie (Sunday, 24 September)
    • Re: Some comments on the current draft Jonathan Worent (Monday, 25 September)
      • [XHTML 2.0] Re: Some comments on the current draft David Latapie (Monday, 25 September)
    • Re: Some comments on the current draft David Woolley (Monday, 25 September)
  • Re: Some comments on the current draft Jonathan Worent (Tuesday, 26 September)
• WHY not allowtransparency attribute?? please explain Clifton Grep (Wednesday, 20 September)
  • Re: WHY not allowtransparency attribute?? please explain Al Gilman (Wednesday, 20 September)
  • Re: WHY not allowtransparency attribute?? please explain David Woolley (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [VE][108] Error Message: XHTML Role Attribute Masayasu Ishikawa (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: CSS and quotation typography David Woolley (Tuesday, 19 September)
  • RE: CSS and quotation typography Paul Nelson (ATC) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Markup for footnote/annotation in XHTML 2 Peter Krantz (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity Christoph Päper (Wednesday, 6 September)
  • Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity Mark Birbeck (Wednesday, 6 September)
    • Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 7 September)
      • Re: Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity Peter Krantz (Thursday, 7 September)
      • Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 7 September)
      • Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 7 September)
      • Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity Steven Pemberton (Thursday, 7 September)
      • Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 7 September)
      • Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity Mark Birbeck (Thursday, 7 September)
      • Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity Steven Pemberton (Thursday, 7 September)
      • Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity Henri Sivonen (Friday, 8 September)
      • Metadata (was: Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity) Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 8 September)
      • Re: Metadata (was: Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity) Peter Krantz (Friday, 8 September)
      • Re: Metadata (was: Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity) Henri Sivonen (Friday, 8 September)
      • Re: Metadata (was: Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity) Karl Dubost (Friday, 8 September)
      • Re: Metadata (was: Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity) Mark Birbeck (Friday, 8 September)
      • Re: Metadata (was: Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity) Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 8 September)
      • Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity Al Gilman (Friday, 8 September)
      • Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity Karl Dubost (Thursday, 7 September)
  • Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity Mark Birbeck (Thursday, 7 September)
    • Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity Dan Brickley (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Henri Sivonen (Friday, 1 September)

• Last message date: Saturday, 30 September 2006 03:24:32 GMT
• Archived on: Monday, 2 October 2006 04:00:00 GMT