![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] [Moderator Action] Re: [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag
From: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:28:01 +0200 To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, www-html-editor@w3.org Cc: "HTML Mailing List" <www-html@w3.org> Message-ID: <50B04315-57FE-4C99-A806-BB747361BA3A@empyree.org> Le 25 sept. 06 à 15:00, Anne van Kesteren a écrit : > On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:54:30 +0200, David Latapie <david@empyree.org> > wrote: >> -- <em role="0"> default >> -- <em role="+1"> equivalent to em >> -- <em role="+2"> equivalent to strong >> -- <em role="-1"> less important, may be rendered as font-size:smaller > > This proposal doesn't cover nesting. Do you mean emphasis inside an emphasis? I suggest *addition* ?Animals (for instance dogs, like _mine_) do it? XHTML 2.0 ?Animals (<em role="-1">for instance dogs, like <em role="+1">mine</em>)</em> do it? 0 -1 +1=0 0 CSS voice-stress |--none-|------------- reduced------------------|---------none-----------|-----none---| (there may also be a final gap at the end of de-emphasis, but this is not related to nesting, this is just an extra thought) Please tell me if answsers shall not be forwarded to editor, only initial proposals. -- </david_latapie> http://blog.empyree.org/ U+0F00Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 13:36:59 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||