Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

[Moderator Action] Re: [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag

From: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:28:01 +0200
To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, www-html-editor@w3.org
Cc: "HTML Mailing List" <www-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <50B04315-57FE-4C99-A806-BB747361BA3A@empyree.org>

Le 25 sept. 06 à 15:00, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :

> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:54:30 +0200, David Latapie <david@empyree.org>  
> wrote:
>> -- <em role="0">    default
>> -- <em role="+1">   equivalent to em
>> -- <em role="+2">   equivalent to strong
>> -- <em role="-1">   less important, may be rendered as font-size:smaller
>
> This proposal doesn't cover nesting.

Do you mean emphasis inside an emphasis? I suggest *addition*

?Animals (for instance dogs, like _mine_) do it?


XHTML 2.0         ?Animals (<em role="-1">for instance dogs, like <em
role="+1">mine</em>)</em> do it?
                        0
-1                                    +1=0                 0
CSS voice-stress |--none-|-------------
reduced------------------|---------none-----------|-----none---|

(there may also be a final gap at the end of de-emphasis, but this is
not related to nesting, this is just an extra thought)

Please tell me if answsers shall not be forwarded to editor, only
initial proposals.

-- 
</david_latapie>
http://blog.empyree.org/    U+0F00
Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 13:36:59 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.