Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: tags vs elements (was: Re: [ot] Re: [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag)

From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:16:26 +0200
Cc: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <20060925161626.162130@gmx.net>
To: david@empyree.org

> > I'm talking about "<em> and <strong>" (not about <em>Some text</em>
> > and <strong>Some text</strong>). So tag is the right word.
> 
> No it isn't. I guess I should update my article.

Since unfortunately, Anne's article rather caused confusion, see either Roger Johansson's [1] or Lachlan Hunt's article [2] on correct terminology.

For now, that should suffice.


[1] http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200508/html_tags_vs_elements_vs_attributes/ 
[2] http://lachy.id.au/log/2004/12/html-tags 


-- 
Jens Meiert
http://meiert.com/ 

Webdesign mit CSS (O'Reilly, German)
http://meiert.com/cssdesign/ 
Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 16:16:40 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.