![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] tags vs elements (was: Re: [ot] Re: [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag)
From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:47:59 +0200 To: "David Latapie" <david@empyree.org> Cc: www-html@w3.org Message-ID: <op.tgfx59je64w2qv@id-c0020> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:23:55 +0200, David Latapie <david@empyree.org> wrote: > I'm talking about "<em> and <strong>" (not about <em>Some text</em> and > <strong>Some text</strong>). So tag is the right word. But thank you for > pointing out Anne's article, it is very useful. No it isn't. I guess I should update my article. Moving this thread to www-html as www-html-editor is clearly not the right list. Tags are only relevant if you're discussing source code or authoring requirements. If you're explicitly talking about the "<p> element start tag" or something. Otherwise you should just refer to them as elements. As in: "The <i> element indicates italics." (Using < and > for lack of markup in e-mails...) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/ > <http://www.opera.com/ >Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 15:48:43 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||