Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Questions About the New HTML and XHTML2 WGs

From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 14:58:46 +1000
Message-ID: <4542E386.4070805@lachy.id.au>
To: www-html <www-html@w3.org>

Hi,
   Regarding Tim BL's announcement this morning [1] to charter a 
completely new HTML WG to focus on (X)HTML 5 and an XHTML2 WG to 
continue with XHTML 2.0, I'm just wondering how it can possibly work?

Does this mean the 2 camps will diverge even further, leaving us with 2 
separate and incompatible, yet competing (X)HTML standards?

If that is the case, can I assume the previous statement [2] that XHTML 
2 will be using the XHTML 1.x namespace will be rescinded, so that at 
least the 2 incompatible versions don't share the same namespace?

Why did the W3C feel that the 2 camps couldn't find a way to work 
together towards their common goals, to produce 1 (X)HTML specification?

Considering that the most of the good concepts from XHTML2 have already 
been incorporated into (X)HTML5 in one form or another, why was it felt 
that there is a need to continue on XHTML 2 as it currently stands?

[1] http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/166 
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html-editor/2006JulSep/0137 

-- 
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/ 
Received on Saturday, 28 October 2006 04:59:14 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.