Le 14 nov. 2006 à 06:46, Jonathan Worent a écrit :
>> XHTML 2.0 isn't exactly compatible with XHTML 1.x, so it would  
>> require
>> major changes in the browser either way.
>>
> If its not compatible why the heck doe it share its namespace. I  
> know this has been brought up
> before but I'm still confused.

As of today, it doesn't
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/conformance.html#strict 

xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/ "

It is though an open issue. I think it would be wrong to share the  
same namespace from a QA point of view, but I'm not the WG.



-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ 
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ 
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***