----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
To: "Philip TAYLOR" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Cc: <www-html@w3.org>; <public-evangelist@w3.org>; <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 1:45 AM
Subject: Re: Well-argued papers on benefits of high-level markup sought


>
> Philip TAYLOR wrote about others abuse on "everytime human" semantic text 
> versus
> "uptodate machine" semantic text.

This way rotates world. You might use what you feel is better. You also 
might know
what x?html is (nothing|used|abused|proper|useful) for. Actually, everything 
could be
flying in the web in the pure xml wings, with your own entitites as client 
side includes
and your own schemas, dtds and or xslt trasnformations that transform your 
own visual
xml in CSS, and your uses of svg or smil when it's proper, and ontologizing 
on that!
....But i am sure you know why doubt.

It is not simply good because you can interpret it visually when it is 
rendered, or googlebot
can eat it, or because you can imagine fantasies on it. But it is good for 
that reasons too.
Reasons are ephemeral reasons more than ever.

Thanks for being there.