On 23 Jun, David Woolley wrote:

>>   the CSS class name.
> 
> class is not a CSS class name.  That's a common misunderstanding and
> leads to class=red, as it becomes viewed as presentational.

  And one I strive to avoid making. Mea culpa.


> It should still be a sub-classing of the semantics.  One is in a
> halfway house, where the sub-classing is not universal, but in a

  I disagree. Semantic interpretation should be associated with
  elements, not attribute values- IMHO, but I would hope that isn't
  needed.

-- 
 -     Tina Holmboe                    Greytower Technologies (UK) Ltd.
   tina@g...                  http://www.greytower.co.uk 
     +46 708 557 905