![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: [XHTML 2.0] emphesis
From: Jonathan Worent <jworent@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 06:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20060626134750.21579.qmail@web32205.mail.mud.yahoo.com> To: HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org> --- "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > > Tina Holmboe wrote: > > On 23 Jun, Jonathan Worent wrote: > > > >> Currently CSS is the only way to achieve more > than two > >> levels of emphasis. I don't know of any browsers > > > > Neither currently, nor in the future*, can CSS > do any such thing. > > There is no way to indicate emphasis using a > stylesheet. > > I'm sure he meant "*visually* indicate/achieve". > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > Yes, Patrick you're correct. There seems to have been some confusion in what I meant. I am suggesting that we need a way to semantically describe multiple levels of emphasis in (x)html. It will then be up to the browsers to represent those levels. I'm also suggesting that we need a way to markup de-emphasis. Let me explain what I meant when I said we have to rely on css for more than 2 levels of emphasis. Take this code: <p>I am <em class="level1>emphasizing</em> random <strong class="level2">words</em> to illustrate a <strong class="level3">point</em>. Whithout CSS <strong class="level2"> and <strong class="level3"> are treated equally. If I want one emphasized more than the other I must use CSS to indicate this. Then if the CSS is ignored they are no longer emphesized differently. I really believe this needs to be explicit in the markup. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.comReceived on Monday, 26 June 2006 13:47:59 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||