Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: Identifying end tags

From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:21:05 +0100
Message-ID: <44A300D1.6060308@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: Shlomi Asaf <neoswf@gmail.com>
CC: www-html@w3.org



Shlomi Asaf wrote:

 >>On 6/28/06, *Laurens Holst* <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl
 > <mailto:lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>> wrote:
 >  >How would that have any effect on my page loading time? I have a 100mbit
 >  >connection. Bandwidth is ever increasing.
 >
 > all users have high speed connection, so you fight against your
 > competitors on the same pipe line, which means that the smaller your
 > file is, the faster it will render on the screen.

[snip]

I might be inclined to ascribe slightly more weight to your argument,
Shlomi, if your own site (cited at the bottom of your message)

	visit my blog: http://www.webcssdesign.34sp.com/ 

was valid (X)HTML.  But it isn't.  Nor does it follow the
very precepts that you set out to convince us are valid :
it contains long class names : "postentry", "postmeta",
"posttitle", multiple (redundant) spaces :
"</a>				</p>", absolute URLs wasting
/reams/ of characters :
href="http://www.webcssdesign.34sp.com/2006/06/working_with_standard_html.html#respond "
and so on.

If you genuinely believe that every byte counts (which I don't :
I believe that layout and readability matter /far/ more) -- then
why not practise what you preach ?

Philip Taylor
Received on Wednesday, 28 June 2006 22:19:54 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.