![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript
From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:00:23 +0100 To: www-html@w3.org Message-ID: <20060729170023.GJ9457@us-lot.org> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 12:51:02PM -0400, magick wrote: > It adds a new query string to the url (site.com/page.html#top) That isn't a query string, it is a fragment identifier. > The JS method puts less strain on the server since it doesn't have to > send a new query to the server to find out where on the page to jump to. Linking to a fragment of an existing document does not, in any browser that I know of, trigger a new request to the server. All the information the browser needs to find the fragment is in the document it already has in memory. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.ukReceived on Saturday, 29 July 2006 17:00:32 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||