Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript

From: Frank Hellenkamp <jonas.info@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 22:21:18 +0200
Message-ID: <44C52BBE.1090902@gmx.net>
To: Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de>
CC: www-html@w3.org
>>> in HTML _and_ XHTML you can change the DOM by adding content via DOM 
>>> methods. And you may need a noscript alternative then. So the need
>>> for  noscript is not a difference between HTML and XHTML.
>>
>> No. With the DOM method, the whole document is the noscript content.
>> You  don't need an element to identify it, you can modify it at will.
> 
> I think, whether you need an alternative (noscript) for the scripting
> depends on what is done in the script. If essential functionality is
> added via scripting, a noscript alternative _is_ needed.

?

why?
in your html is the content *without* javascript with all essential
functionality.
if javascript is active, you can hide, change or whatever this with your
script.

so?


frank

-- 
frank hellenkamp | interface designer
jonas.info@gmx.net | mail
+49.30.49 78 20 70 | tel
+49.173.70 55 781 | mbl
+49.12120.243 912 | fax



Received on Monday, 24 July 2006 20:21:39 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.