![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript
From: Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:00:10 +0200 Message-ID: <44CB860A.3090801@w3development.de> To: www-html@w3.org magick wrote: > > You all are [expletive deleted] me off. In clear and plain English. YES OR NO. > Can you use <noscript> in xhtml2? Have a look at the public working draft for XHTML 2.0 and see if there is a noscript element. The list of elements <http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml2-20060726/elements.html#a_elements > does not show a noscript element. Question answered. Pretty easy, wasn't it? > And here is a very good example why you may want to use it: > > Let's say you have this > > <a href='javascript:history.go(-1)'>Go back to the page you just left</a> > > In your document, well anyone with JavaScript disabled or not supported > will just get a link that doesn't do anything. Annoying those people. > So what do we do, it's simple. > > <script type='text/javascript'> > <!-- > document.write ("<a href='javascript:history.go(-1)'>Go back to the page > you just left<\/a>") > --> > </script> > <noscript><!--NOOP--></noscript> > > Now if someone has JS enabled, they'll see the link, if not they see > nothing. It's the best of both worlds. Why do you need a noscript element here? -- Johannes Koch Spem in alium nunquam habui praeter in te, Deus Israel. (Thomas Tallis, 40-part motet)Received on Saturday, 29 July 2006 16:01:13 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||