![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript
From: magick <jasper.magick@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:44:45 -0400 To: www-html@w3.org Message-id: <44CE256D.3000304@gmail.com> > > > > <a href="sword.gif" onclick="annoyingPopup();"><img > > > src="thumb_sword.gif" alt="..."/></a> > > > No that won't work because it will open the image in a pop-up *and* in > > the window. So it just opens the image twice. > > The only problem was that he forgot to include "return false" in the > onclick. Thank you, that did work as expected :) > In all fairness Jasper, ....... <http://www.mikeash.com/getting_answers.html > > > Best wishes, > > Stevne Pemberton Understood. When the topic started going off into all different directions, I got confused as I was reading all this information that didn't have to do with the issue but rather changed the issue around. Like when I asked if <noscript> was being renamed, then I read all these replies about how it's not needed and/or not supported in xhtml2 and I was like "what? if it's not even supported why didn't the original reply state that in it". Again, I'm sorry for any aggression I displayed in this mailing list. Steven, you seem to give more clear information than others in these lists and I thank you for that. With everyone else the information is fuzzy and left to interpretation.Received on Monday, 31 July 2006 15:45:10 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||