![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript
From: Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:57:40 +0200 Message-ID: <44C4DFE4.2010300@w3development.de> To: www-html@w3.org Hi Steven, Steven Pemberton wrote: > <script> works differently in HTML and XHTML, because > document.write doesn't work in XML. > > <noscript> is needed in HTML for those cases where the <script> > elements haven't been able to do their document.write work, and you > need *something* in its place. in HTML _and_ XHTML you can change the DOM by adding content via DOM methods. And you may need a noscript alternative then. So the need for noscript is not a difference between HTML and XHTML. -- Johannes Koch In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum. (Te Deum, 4th cent.)Received on Monday, 24 July 2006 14:57:53 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||