![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated
From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:04:42 +0000 Message-ID: <43CD4DDA.3080208@splintered.co.uk> To: www-html@w3.org Garret Wilson wrote: > The former is a fragment of a web page on XHTML > explaining how to use the <em> element, and actually displays the > literal string "<em>foo</em>". Should the < and > not be encoded as < and > in that particular case? -- Patrick H. Lauke __________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __________________________________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __________________________________________________________Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:04:49 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||