Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated

From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:56:08 +0100
Message-ID: <20060129135608.525npwjzusohwk4s@webmail.annevankesteren.nl>
To: Daniel Schierbeck <daniel.schierbeck@gmail.com>
Cc: Garret Wilson <garret@globalmentor.com>, www-html@w3.org

Quoting Daniel Schierbeck <daniel.schierbeck@gmail.com>:
> It's been a while since this thread ceased being active, but I've 
> been thinking of a more elegant way of transferring chunks of XHTML 
> between applications/documents. This could eventually be added to 
> XHTML 2.0.
>
> My proposal is to add a <fragment/> root element that encapsulates 
> the XHTML content being sent. That way you could send that content as 
> application/xhtml+xml.

That would still require an update of RFC 3236. I also don't really see the
advantage over using simply a <div> element with the namespace applied 
to it or
some random element in another namespace. I also don't see why would want to
send it over the wire as application/xhtml+xml.

(Atom uses a <div> element as root for XHTML fragments.)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/ >
Received on Sunday, 29 January 2006 12:56:10 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.