Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Fwd: RE: XHTML Print & DTDs

From: Edward Lass <elass@goer.state.ny.us>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 11:49:55 -0500
Message-Id: <s3eb2c7e.018@mail.goer.state.ny.us>
To: <www-html@w3.org>

Katrina,

In this case, your source is using the MIME type for a superceded
version of XHTML-Print [1], not the W3C Proposed Recommendation [2]. 

W3C XHTML-Print documents and XHTML 1.0 Strict documents are both
served as application/xhtml+xml. So is this mismatching a fatal error? I
think that depends entirely on the user agent. You say you're developing
a parser; my suggestion is that you find a place to get information
about XML parsing more broadly. And I suspect the Modularization of
XHTML spec [3] will be important to you, if you're not already familiar
with it. (XHTML 1.1 is "modularized" and only has one flavor (strict);
the three flavors of XHTML 1.0 predate this.)

Ed.

[1]
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/candidates/cs-xpxprt10-20030331-5102.1.html

[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-print/  
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/ 

>>> katrina maramba <ka3na_423@yahoo.com> 2/8/2006 11:56:09 PM >>>
Can anybody answer my question below.. Thank you! =)

katrina maramba <ka3na_423@yahoo.com> wrote:
  Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 21:08:32 -0800 (PST)
From: katrina maramba <ka3na_423@yahoo.com>
To: david@us-lot.org 
CC: www-html@w3.org 
Subject: RE: XHTML Print & DTDs



David Dorward <david@us-lot.org> wrote:     Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006
09:58:29 +0000
From: David Dorward <david@us-lot.org>
To: katrina maramba <ka3na_423@yahoo.com>
CC: www-html@w3.org 
Subject: XHTML Print & DTDs


> 4. As I stated, it is stated in the XHTML-Print spec that the DTD
that
> should be used is xhtml-print10.dtd. What happens when the user
> specifies a different DTD (Strict, Transitional, Frameset)? 

Then it won't be an XHTML-Print document :)
   
  But that wouldn't be a fatal error, would it?  Printers should still
process this kind of document?
   
  I have gathered a number of (supposed-to-be) XHTML-Print data from
Nokia and Samsung cellphones.  The DTD specified in both
cellphone-generated XHTML-Print files is xhtml1-strict.dtd.  They were
accepted and printed in HP printers.  
   
  Here is an example.  I got this from Samsung and the MIME header
stated that it is XHTML-Print but its DTD is strict.  Please take a
look.
   
  Content-Type: application/vnd.pwg-multiplexed;
type=application/vnd.pwg-xhtml-print+xml
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
  CHK 1 795 MORE
Content-Type: application/vnd.pwg-xhtml-print+xml
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-Location: bpp_jpg.xhtml
  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
 "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd ">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml ">
<head>....
  .....
   
   
  Any help and comment would be appreciated.
  Thank you!
    
---------------------------------
  Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.

		
---------------------------------
Brings words and photos together (easily) with
 PhotoMail  - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.

This message has been scanned by the NYS GOER WebShield.
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2006 16:48:48 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.