![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: Question about XHTML 2.0 and content type
From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 00:56:42 -0800 To: www-html@w3.org Message-ID: <20060204085642.GD3839@ridley.dbaron.org> On Thursday 2006-02-02 22:08 +0100, Christian Hujer wrote: > I'm glad that Mozilla negotiates to accept application/xhtml+xml with higher > priority than text/html, I'm not. Mozilla's handling of application/xhtml+xml is inferior to its handling of text/html, since the former is not displayed incrementally (that is, nothing shows up until the entire document has been retrieved from the network). It is therefore a disservice to our users to claim that application/xhtml+xml is better than text/html. -David -- L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ > Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, Mozilla CorporationReceived on Saturday, 4 February 2006 20:25:06 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||