![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] block@kind vs elt@structure
From: Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:44:58 -0500 Message-ID: <fb6fbf560602020844n63ef6821w83ec24e5192027cb@mail.gmail.com> To: www-html-editor@w3.org Cc: www-html@w3.org http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/mod-structural.html#sec_8.10 . lists block@kind as an open issue. I'm not sure anyone is entirely comfortable with the kind attribute representing the actual semantic value. How about adding a structure attribute, perhaps even to the core attributes? (What we really want is "conceptual size", but size *will* be used for styling.) Then, instead of <block kind=samp>... Users would write <samp structure=block>... If there are too many concerns about letting the content model depend on an attribute, then I would suggest adding a block element to the Text content set, so that people could write <samp><block><p>now you can use more than inline -- because it isn't a direct descendent of samp. </p></block></samp> -jJReceived on Thursday, 2 February 2006 16:45:02 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||