Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

block@kind vs elt@structure

From: Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:44:58 -0500
Message-ID: <fb6fbf560602020844n63ef6821w83ec24e5192027cb@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-html-editor@w3.org
Cc: www-html@w3.org

http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/mod-structural.html#sec_8.10 . lists
block@kind as an open issue.  I'm not sure anyone is entirely
comfortable with the kind attribute representing the actual semantic
value.

How about adding a structure attribute, perhaps even to the core
attributes?  (What we really want is "conceptual size", but size
*will* be used for styling.)

Then, instead of

    <block kind=samp>...

Users would write

    <samp structure=block>...

If there are too many concerns about letting the content model depend
on an attribute, then I would suggest adding a block element to the
Text content set, so that people could write

    <samp><block><p>now you can use more than inline --
                                     because it isn't a direct
descendent of samp.
    </p></block></samp>

-jJ
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2006 16:45:02 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.