Le 6 déc. 2006 à 06:42, Ian Hickson a écrit :
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
>>
>> There has been a fairly protracted discussion recently
>> concerning the pros and cons of serving XHTML documents
>> as text/html  or as application/xhtml+xml
>
> Note that in HTML5/XHTML5, any content sent as text/html is assumed  
> to be
> HTML5, and must be checked as such, and any content sent as XHTML5 is
> assumed to be XML, and must be checked as such. You can find an
> HTML5/XHTML5 validator (undergoing active development) here:
>
>    http://hsivonen.iki.fi/validator/html5/ 

Wrong address. The message is

Le 6 déc. 2006 à 03:19, Philip TAYLOR a écrit :
> it states that the (page) is "Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional"
> without issuing even a warning that it is being served as
> text/html rather than application/xhtml+xml.

So in this case, it has nothing to do with Web Apps 1.0
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/validator/ 


-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ 
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ 
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***