Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: how is this Strict valid?

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:14:07 +0000
Message-ID: <458BF63F.1020603@splintered.co.uk>
To: www-html@w3.org

Tina Holmboe wrote:

>   "Note that in XHTML 1.0, the name attribute of these elements is
>    formally deprecated, and will be removed in a subsequent version
>    of XHTML." - quote the XHTML 1.0 spec.
> 
>   I wouldn't call it "perfectly ok".

Then we'll agree to disagree here. If there's a valid reason for using 
it, even if it's deprecated but still present, I'd call that perfectly 
ok (as long as the developer is aware of it).

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
__________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com 
__________________________________________________________
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/ 
__________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 22 December 2006 15:14:30 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.