Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: how is this Strict valid?

From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:12:39 +0100 (CET)
To: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <tkrat.27b599a9857ca1dc@greytower.net>

On 22 Dec, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:

> Well, you thought wrong. in XHTML 1.0 Strict it's still perfectly ok
> in situations like these. XHTML 1.1 would be another matter.

  "Note that in XHTML 1.0, the name attribute of these elements is
   formally deprecated, and will be removed in a subsequent version
   of XHTML." - quote the XHTML 1.0 spec.

  I wouldn't call it "perfectly ok".

-- 
 -       Tina Holmboe                           Greytower Technologies
       tina@g...                      http://www.greytower.net 
        +46 708 557 905
Received on Friday, 22 December 2006 14:13:49 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.