Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: XHTML 1.0, section C14

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 08:18:27 +0900
Message-Id: <F81834EF-B186-4F4F-8CBB-A2D62DF0B7FC@w3.org>
Cc: HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
To: James Pickering <jp29@cox.net>, www-qa@w3.org

Hi James,

Le 2 déc. 2006 à 07:53, James Pickering a écrit :
> I became disillusioned with the W3C some time ago when I responded  
> to their request for input relating to other popular Web Servers  
> (than Apache) as solicited on their Web page relating to Content  
> Negotiation: http://www.w3.org/2003/01/xhtml-mimetype/content - 
> negotiation
> My input related to Zeus 3.xx. I never received an acknowledgement  
> of my efforts nor was my input incorporated in their Web page.

Where did you send your input?
on www-qa@w3.org and/or dom@w3.org?

I see from you
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Aug/0030 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Aug/0028 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Aug/0027 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Aug/0020 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Aug/0016 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Aug/0014 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Aug/0006 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Aug/0001 

I see plenty of replies of dom, bjoern, henri, jim, brian and myself  
on the thread.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Aug/thread.html#30 


The document invites to comment and that is cool you sent more  
background for the community. The discussion is a community process,  
so when everyone is participating, everyone become richer of ideas.  
Were you expecting more?
Thanks for your contribution, I'm pretty sure people on the list have  
appreciated them.


> J. Pickering
> Home Page/Directory Portal: http://jp29.org/ 
> XHTML: a troubled Markup language: http://jp29.org/test.php 
>
>> On 21 Nov, Shane McCarron wrote:
>>
>>> And please, let's not devolve into a discussion about content
>>> negotiation.  The method above works.  Does it [expletive deleted]?  Sure.  Are  
>>> there
>>> browsers that lie in their request headers?  I surely hope not,  
>>> but if
>>> there are.... they deserve what they get.
>

-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ 
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ 
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 1 December 2006 23:19:09 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.