![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: XHTML 1.0, section C14
From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 08:18:27 +0900 Message-Id: <F81834EF-B186-4F4F-8CBB-A2D62DF0B7FC@w3.org> Cc: HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org> To: James Pickering <jp29@cox.net>, www-qa@w3.org Hi James, Le 2 déc. 2006 à 07:53, James Pickering a écrit : > I became disillusioned with the W3C some time ago when I responded > to their request for input relating to other popular Web Servers > (than Apache) as solicited on their Web page relating to Content > Negotiation: http://www.w3.org/2003/01/xhtml-mimetype/content - > negotiation > My input related to Zeus 3.xx. I never received an acknowledgement > of my efforts nor was my input incorporated in their Web page. Where did you send your input? on www-qa@w3.org and/or dom@w3.org? I see from you http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Aug/0030 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Aug/0028 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Aug/0027 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Aug/0020 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Aug/0016 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Aug/0014 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Aug/0006 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Aug/0001 I see plenty of replies of dom, bjoern, henri, jim, brian and myself on the thread. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Aug/thread.html#30 The document invites to comment and that is cool you sent more background for the community. The discussion is a community process, so when everyone is participating, everyone become richer of ideas. Were you expecting more? Thanks for your contribution, I'm pretty sure people on the list have appreciated them. > J. Pickering > Home Page/Directory Portal: http://jp29.org/ > XHTML: a troubled Markup language: http://jp29.org/test.php > >> On 21 Nov, Shane McCarron wrote: >> >>> And please, let's not devolve into a discussion about content >>> negotiation. The method above works. Does it [expletive deleted]? Sure. Are >>> there >>> browsers that lie in their request headers? I surely hope not, >>> but if >>> there are.... they deserve what they get. > -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Friday, 1 December 2006 23:19:09 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||