Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: Re: samp, kbd, var and code

From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:28:27 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200608232228.k7NMSRS29229@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
To: www-html@w3.org

> code and blockcode should be removed with samp, kbd and var. Is there
> anyone on this list that can argument for their existence?

I'd more or less agree about code and blockcode, with the caveat that
that prevents the use of pure XHTML to document the XHTML language.
That may well be a strong enough reason for keeping them.

samp, kbd and var are relevant for nearly any instruction document
for a man machine interface, including a web site's HCI, so I would
consider them a requirement for most web sites and a large number
of consumer documents on web sites.
Received on Wednesday, 23 August 2006 22:41:02 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.