Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: sub/sup (was Re: samp, kbd, var)

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:04:05 +0100
Message-ID: <20060823100405.pnyr2a225jwgwk0w@www.splintered.co.uk>
To: www-html@w3.org

Quoting David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>:

> There are many different elements to reflect the various uses of
> italics, but they are amongst the most misunderstood and under or
> mis-used elemnts in HTML (cite, address, dfn, etc.)

Exactly, so I wonder if the same approach couldn't conceivably be  
taken for at least some of the cases where sub/sup currently have to  
be used.

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
__________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com 
__________________________________________________________
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/ 
__________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 23 August 2006 09:08:36 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.