![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: sub/sup (was Re: samp, kbd, var)
From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:04:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20060823100405.pnyr2a225jwgwk0w@www.splintered.co.uk> To: www-html@w3.org Quoting David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>: > There are many different elements to reflect the various uses of > italics, but they are amongst the most misunderstood and under or > mis-used elemnts in HTML (cite, address, dfn, etc.) Exactly, so I wonder if the same approach couldn't conceivably be taken for at least some of the cases where sub/sup currently have to be used. P -- Patrick H. Lauke __________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __________________________________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __________________________________________________________Received on Wednesday, 23 August 2006 09:08:36 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||