![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] [html] "title" text semantics, and "minor" element discussion
From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:15:21 +0200 (MEST) To: www-html@w3.org Message-ID: <7650.1129587321@www8.gmx.net> Dear Working Group (and list members), I sometimes wonder about two special HTML issues anyway: * In general, why ain't it allowed to include markup within the "title" element [1], what's the historical background? Aren't at least abbreviations a perfect example for the usefulness of semantics here? And since I could theoretically even show the "title" element ("title { display: block; }") on the page, doesn't this even require the possibility to include other elements as well? * Also in general, why is there no way to designate rather "unimportant" text? I can use "em" and "strong" for emphasis, but what about text that is rather unimportant, because unrelated, for example? The "span" element does not do this, so what about a kind of "minor" element? From an usability pov, this is a "questionable" approach, and it surely (and hopefully) is a rare case, but why hasn't this been addressed anyway? Looking forward to clarification and discussion. Regards, Jens. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#h-7.4.2 -- Jens Meiert Information Architect http://meiert.com/Received on Monday, 17 October 2005 22:15:26 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||