Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

[html] "title" text semantics, and "minor" element discussion

From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:15:21 +0200 (MEST)
To: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <7650.1129587321@www8.gmx.net>

Dear Working Group (and list members),


I sometimes wonder about two special HTML issues anyway:

* In general, why ain't it allowed to include markup within the "title"
element [1], what's the historical background? Aren't at least abbreviations
a perfect example for the usefulness of semantics here? And since I could
theoretically even show the "title" element ("title { display: block; }") on
the page, doesn't this even require the possibility to include other
elements as well?

* Also in general, why is there no way to designate rather "unimportant"
text? I can use "em" and "strong" for emphasis, but what about text that is
rather unimportant, because unrelated, for example? The "span" element does
not do this, so what about a kind of "minor" element? From an usability pov,
this is a "questionable" approach, and it surely (and hopefully) is a rare
case, but why hasn't this been addressed anyway?

Looking forward to clarification and discussion.


Regards,
 Jens.


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#h-7.4.2 


-- 
Jens Meiert
Information Architect

http://meiert.com/ 
Received on Monday, 17 October 2005 22:15:26 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.