Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: [html] "title" text semantics, and "minor" element discussion

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:34:50 +0000 (UTC)
To: "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
Cc: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>, www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0510181632430.23945@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
>
> you may make some conclusions from the fact that
> - there is no real semantic definition for <em> and <strong>
>   (e.g., how they relate to each other, and what does it mean
>   to nest them?)
> - nobody cared to add markup for "unimportant" or "de-emphasis",
>   despite the obvious need as soon as you start thinking semantically.

You may be interested in perusing (and commenting on) the definitions of 
this and other elements proposed in the Web Apps 1.0 draft:

   http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#semantics 

Cheers,
-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/        U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2005 16:34:59 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.