![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: [html] "title" text semantics, and "minor" element discussion
From: Osmo Saarikumpu <osmo@kotikone.fi>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:27:20 +0300 Message-ID: <4357B758.1020609@kotikone.fi> To: www-html@w3.org Christophe Strobbe wrote: > On rereading that section: "Such an attribute [=title or full] should be > repeated each time the abbreviation is *defined* in the document" > [emphasis added]. 'Defined' is not the same as 'used'. Yes, I misread it. I guess that I'm missing something, as what it really says seems redundant nonsense to me. Consider the given example: The <span id="w3c">World Wide Web Consortium</span> (<abbr full="#w3c">W3C</abbr>) develops interoperable... Where the attribute refers to the immediate context. This is what should be marked, but not when the abbreviation appears say five paragraphs later? Now I'm really confused :) > I agree that it helps but I don't agree that it should be required for > every instance. I actually see no requirement to provide the expansion > for every instance: once is enough to meet the letter of this checkpoint. Perhaps we misunderstand each other here. I'm not advocating for a *must*, but for a *should*, as in RFC 2119. Regards, OsmoReceived on Thursday, 20 October 2005 15:29:16 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||