Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: [html] "title" text semantics, and "minor" element discussion

From: Osmo Saarikumpu <osmo@kotikone.fi>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:27:20 +0300
Message-ID: <4357B758.1020609@kotikone.fi>
To: www-html@w3.org

Christophe Strobbe wrote:

> On rereading that section: "Such an attribute [=title or full] should be 
> repeated each time the abbreviation is *defined* in the document" 
> [emphasis added]. 'Defined' is not the same as 'used'.

Yes, I misread it. I guess that I'm missing something, as what it really 
says seems redundant nonsense to me.

Consider the given example:

The <span id="w3c">World Wide Web Consortium</span> (<abbr 
full="#w3c">W3C</abbr>) develops interoperable...

Where the attribute refers to the immediate context. This is what should 
be marked, but not when the abbreviation appears say five paragraphs 
later? Now I'm really confused :)

> I agree that it helps but I don't agree that it should be required for 
> every instance. I actually see no requirement to provide the expansion 
> for every instance: once is enough to meet the letter of this checkpoint.

Perhaps we misunderstand each other here. I'm not advocating for a 
*must*, but for a *should*, as in RFC 2119.

Regards,
Osmo
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2005 15:29:16 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.