Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: Head-Body Design Pattern

From: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:30:57 -0500
Message-ID: <abd6c8010511140630k1eb5a80fw21f86e6ff95adc16@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-html@w3.org

On 11/14/05, Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In the thread on renaming the html element type
> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2005Nov/0061.html ), Sjoerd
> Visscher wrote:
> <blockquote>
> I see only one good reason to change this, and that is to get rid of the
> html/head/body structure. The latest WD makes a big step towards putting
> meta data in the content. This makes it possible to drop the head completely.
> </blockquote>
>
> It is not necessary to get rid of the head, just because it is possible to
> do this. Some people may want a clean separation between metadata and
> content, as described in the Head-Body design pattern
> (http://www.xmlpatterns.com/HeadBodyMain.shtml ). If there are use cases for
> this pattern, why prevent people from using it?

But XHTML 2.0 doesn't really do a great job of separating metadata
from content. In fact it has all these new structures in order to
place more metadata in the content itself, not that I agree that's the
best place for it, but that's what they're doing.


--

Orion Adrian
Received on Monday, 14 November 2005 14:31:01 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.