![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: [Structure Module] Renaming the <html> element to more semantic name
From: (wrong string) Ð?Ñ?дабÑ?ло <chernovik@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:58:45 +0300 Message-ID: <42a259d60511140458u22693f86y862e2f7965a5fdf7@mail.gmail.com> To: www-html@w3.org On 11/14/05, sjoerd@w3future.com <sjoerd@w3future.com> wrote: > > > > <section> > > <section id="first"> > > <link rel="stylesheet" href="somestyles.css" type="text/css"/> > > <!-- content --> > > </section> > > <section id="second"> > > <link rel="stylesheet" href="morestyles.css" type="text/css"/> > > <!-- content --> > > </section> > > </section> > > > > A better example: > > <section> > > <section id="first"> > > <link rel="next" href="freaky.xhtml"/> > > <!-- content --> > > </section> > > <section id="second"> > > <link rel="next" href="funky.xhtml"/> > > <!-- content --> > > </section> > > </section> > > Note that these links can already be created with the various linking and > meta constructions in XHTML 2. So these problems will have to be resolved > anyway. > By the way, I rightly understand, that <a href="..." rel="next">...</a> <a href="..." rel="prev">...</a> is preferable to <link href="..." rel="next" title="..." .../> <link href="..." rel="prev" title="..." .../> is it?Received on Monday, 14 November 2005 12:59:11 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||