 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: [Structure Module] Renaming the <html> element to more semantic name
From: Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@tigerstaden.no>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 20:17:58 +0100 To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Ai / Hiro <i@orz.cc> Cc: www-html@w3.org Message-id: <op.s0rej8cg16f2qb@quark.hv1alan> On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 05:24:13 +0100, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote: >> We markup a title with <title/> just because it is a "title". I think >> we should markup a document with <document/> just because it is a >> "document" in terms of the meanings of the content. > > I don't think so, it says nothing about what type of document it is. And neither does <title> say anything about what kind of title it is. So your argument doesn't hold water. I agree with mr. Hiro here. The <html> element is semantically wrong and does not, since the introduction of XML Namespaces, give any information we don't already have to the structure. <document xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml "> says that this is a "document" written in the "XHTML vocaublary". -- Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- http://virtuelvis.com/quark/ «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»Received on Thursday, 24 November 2005 19:16:50 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||
