Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD

From: Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl@getdesigned.at>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 22:31:00 +0200
Message-ID: <4298D504.3050409@getdesigned.at>
To: www-html@w3.org

I agree as well with the whole issue.

Laurens Holst wrote:

>
> However, with the role of a section defined as an attribute, it will 
> be somewhat difficult to style without shorthand in CSS that e.g. the 
> class attribute offers (which I used as â??roleâ?? before). I think a 
> solution needs to be found for that.
>
I don't think a shorthand is needed for that. I think that the current 
CSS2/3 syntax is sufficient. (And I strongly doubt that there will be 
any XHTML 2.0 browser that doesn't support those selectors.)

ul[role=menu] li {
}
Received on Saturday, 28 May 2005 20:31:03 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.