![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 09:59:49 -0500 Message-ID: <429C7BE5.20802@aptest.com> To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com> CC: www-html@w3.org Jim Ley wrote: >The fact that the specification doesn't say it is? the fact that it uses >the word collection, whereas for ordered it uses the word "sequence" - Of >course the actual specification like so much else is so underspecified that >we can't really say. > >However, if you're right, and it is ordered, then the fact you can't have >unordered navigation is still of a concern to me. > > Navigation lists are definitely ordered. "Collection" in this context is not a formal mathematical term. However, as it seems confusing, I have changed the source to now read: Navigation lists are intended to be used to define lists of selectable items for ordered presentation in a "navigation" menu. I also think we should add an assertion at this point that indicates menu items are presented in document order. I appreciate that there is no "unordered" navigation menu, but I don't even know what that might mean. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.comReceived on Tuesday, 31 May 2005 15:00:01 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||