>>> David Håsäther <hasather@gmail.com> 5/26/2005 3:36:08 PM >>>
>
> I'm not sure I agree using a definition list with only terms, and no 
> definitions makes sense, though. Can't think of any circumstances where 
> that would be appropriate, got any examples?

How about an incomplete glossary?  It could be wiki-based or on an individual page in progress.

To say there's no definition--or at least not yet--one could leave the element out entirely.  That seems preferable over "<dd/>" to me.

- Ed.