 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 document conformance requirements
From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 22:03:09 +0000 (UTC) To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org, W3C HTML <www-html@w3.org> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505292201590.32387@dhalsim.dreamhost.com> On Sun, 29 May 2005, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > * Simplifying the example to: > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/ " xml:lang="en"> > <head> > <title>Virtual Library</title> > </head> > <body> > <p>Moved to <a href="http://example.org/ ">example.org</a>.</p> > </body> > </html> It could be simplified further by removing the <?xml?> line, which is redundant. Also, the entire example is rather poor, since a redirect would be much better done as a 30x redirect, and having the primary example of an XHTML document be the entity body of a 30x, which is not usually seen by users, seems suboptimal. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Sunday, 29 May 2005 22:03:21 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||
