David Håsäther wrote:
> Also, the content model for di is:
> 
> ( dt+, dd*)
> 
> This means that no definition data is required. Unless there is a 
> specific reason for this, it should be changed to:
> 
> (dt, dd)+

I think (hope) this is intentional. This is also the case in HTML 4.

A use scenario is a document documenting a list of attribute values for
an element, where not all attribute values have been documented yet.

This is an actual case in the reference documentation of my companyâ??s 
product.


~Grauw


-- 
Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!!