![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: SGML
From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 21:08:18 +0000 (GMT) Message-Id: <200503072108.j27L8Is00566@djwhome.demon.co.uk> To: www-html@w3.org > increase the depth of tree. But if instead the tags are <br/> the depth > of the parse tree remains same. > > The reason why I don't want to handle tag soup parsing in the parser is <br> in HTML is NOT tag soup. Tag soup is things like: <b> xxx <i> yyy </b> zzz </i> - elements don't nest <b><p>......</p></b> - content model violated (block in inline) <br> in HTML has the same meaning as <br/> in XHTML, and results in the same parse tree. HTML will be required for decades to come, not just for legacy content. IE doesn't support proper XHTML. I believe the suggestion to have a tag soup and XML parser was trying to say that a good tag soup parser will also parse valid HTML. It wasn't saying that valid HTML is tag soup.Received on Monday, 7 March 2005 21:12:30 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||