Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: SGML

From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 21:08:18 +0000 (GMT)
Message-Id: <200503072108.j27L8Is00566@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
To: www-html@w3.org

> increase the depth of tree. But if instead the tags are <br/> the depth 
> of the parse tree remains same.
> 
> The reason why I don't want to handle tag soup parsing in the parser is 

<br> in HTML is NOT tag soup.  Tag soup is things like:

<b>  xxx <i> yyy </b> zzz </i>      - elements don't nest
<b><p>......</p></b>                - content model violated (block in inline)

<br> in HTML has the same meaning as <br/> in XHTML, and results in the
same parse tree.

HTML will be required for decades to come, not just for legacy content.
IE doesn't support proper XHTML.

I believe the suggestion to have a tag soup and XML parser was trying to
say that a good tag soup parser will also parse valid HTML.  It wasn't
saying that valid HTML is tag soup.
Received on Monday, 7 March 2005 21:12:30 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.