Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

RE: DC in XHTML2

From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 23:16:05 +0100
Message-ID: <A09C652B-FA32-4FD5-AB4C-FC28BE541912@S009>
To: "'Misha Wolf'" <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <semantic-web@w3.org>, <www-html@w3.org>, <iptc-metadata@yahoogroups.com>, <dc-general@jiscmail.ac.uk>
Hi Misha,

One way to achieve a more abbreviated mark-up, even if it is not the full
solution of 'QNames in @href', is to use @xml:base. All @href values will be
relative to this, and an RDF/A processor should honour changes of base URI
through the mark-up. It will at least make your mark-up more compact.

That's not to say that we shouldn't try to find other solutions, too. In one
of my early drafts of RDF/A I did actually have an additional attribute
called @resource, which was a QName, and which sat alongside @href. See
section 4.2 of RDF/XHTML, as it was then called:

  <http://www.formsplayer.com/notes/xhtml-meta-data-03.html >

There was some resistance to it, since some people rightly say that QNames
are not URIs. But anyway, I'll take another look at it, since I certainly
think that yours is a strong use case for something less that a full URI.

Regards,

Mark

PS Good to see you all at your AGM today, and even better to see that your
requirements are being fed into the XHTML2 and RDF/A work!


Mark Birbeck
CEO
x-port.net Ltd.

e: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net
t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/ 
b: http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/ 

Download our XForms processor from
http://www.formsPlayer.com/  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-html-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Misha Wolf
> Sent: 07 June 2005 18:04
> To: dc-general@jiscmail.ac.uk
> Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org; semantic-web@w3.org; 
> www-html@w3.org; iptc-metadata@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: DC in XHTML2
> 
> 
> As some of you will know, the XHTML2 draft [1] introduces a 
> very interesting syntax for RDF, which many would consider to 
> be an improvement on the traditional RDF/XML syntax.  No 
> doubt, many content authors will be seeking to add DC 
> metadata to their XHTML2 content using these new mechanisms.
> 
> The News Architecture Working Party of the International 
> Press Telecommunications Council (IPTC) is investigating the use of
> XHTML2 for expressing DC and other metadata.  A major problem 
> for us is the lack of support in the current XHTML2 draft (as 
> in RDF/XML) for the use of QNames to express terms in 
> controlled vocabularies (aka values of properties).
> 
> At the moment, the XHTML2 @content attribute takes PCDATA and 
> the @href attribute takes IRIs.  There is no attribute 
> available for QNames.
> 
> We want to be able to use, eg, <dc:subject> with a QName as a 
> value (ie the object of the RDF statement).  The reasons 
> include legibility and compactness.  News items (and news 
> headlines) often carry numerous subject codes, hence the need 
> for compactness.
> 
> Is anyone else in the DC community looking at the use of DC in
> XHTML2 and thinking along similar lines to us?  We would be 
> very happy to work with others on this issue.
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2 
> 
> Misha Wolf
> Standards Manager, Reuters
> Chair, News Metadata Framework WG, IPTC
> Vice-Chair, News Architecture WP, IPTC
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>         Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com 
> 
> To find out more about Reuters Products and Services visit 
> http://www.reuters.com/productinfo  
> 
> Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  
> individual sender,  except  where  the sender specifically 
> states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2005 22:17:14 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.