Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
> I'm afraid you might be right. In that case, the version XHTML 2 could 
> be skipped (left an unfinished draft, in the tradition of HTML), and 
> XHTML 3
> could follow the principles outlined in April 1, 2003:
> http://w2c.shorturl.com 
> Briefly, this would mean an integration of CSS into XHTML, saving much 
> trouble and learning difficultes.
Isnā??t that like, XSL-FO?


~Grauw

-- 
Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.