Le 13 juil. 2005, à 07:02, Christophe Strobbe a écrit :
> 2. I haven't seen any ASCII art for ages. It seems like a relic of the 
> nineties; web developers now have much better technologies for visual 
> information at their disposal. Can you provide three examples of ASCII 
> art available on the Web today?

hmmm :)
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3986.html 

That's one
    The following are two example URIs and their component parts:

          foo://example.com:8042/over/there?name=ferret#nose
          \_/   \______________/\_________/ \_________/ \__/
           |           |            |            |        |
        scheme     authority       path        query   fragment
           |   _____________________|__
          / \ /                        \
          urn:example:animal:ferret:nose


That's a second one
This can be visualized graphically
    as follows:

          .----------------------------------------------------------.
          |  .----------------------------------------------------.  |
          |  |  .----------------------------------------------.  |  |
          |  |  |  .----------------------------------------.  |  |  |
          |  |  |  |  .----------------------------------.  |  |  |  |
          |  |  |  |  |       <relative-reference>       |  |  |  |  |
          |  |  |  |  `----------------------------------'  |  |  |  |
          |  |  |  | (5.1.1) Base URI embedded in content   |  |  |  |
          |  |  |  `----------------------------------------'  |  |  |
          |  |  | (5.1.2) Base URI of the encapsulating entity |  |  |
          |  |  |         (message, representation, or none)   |  |  |
          |  |  `----------------------------------------------'  |  |
          |  | (5.1.3) URI used to retrieve the entity            |  |
          |  `----------------------------------------------------'  |
          | (5.1.4) Default Base URI (application-dependent)         |
          `----------------------------------------------------------'

And this mail if it was sent as XHTML 2.0 would be a third one.



-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ 
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***