Wrong. Moveable Type, to name just one example, will generate static 
pages (I'm using it).

On Jan 23, 2005, at 5:32 AM, Trejkaz wrote:

> On Sunday 23 January 2005 19:22, you wrote:
>> Actually, no, there are applications far less static than weblogs,
>> particularly the vast majority of weblogs, which are not frequently
>> updated or commented upon. Hence many are in fact implemented as I
>> describe. Many more use various caching schemes, even non-weblog Web
>> applications. So your suggestion that they serve a different page to
>> Google would not be feasible or as easy to implement as you seem to
>> suggest.
>
> Generating two static pages for every one weblog page wouldn't exactly 
> be
> rocket science, either.
>
> But anyway, the vast majority of weblogs that seem to exist right now 
> _are_
> dynamic, including AFAIK all the ones Google actually listed on that 
> page of
> theirs.
>
> TX
>
>
> -- 
>              Email: Trejkaz Xaoza <trejkaz@trypticon.org>
>           Web site: http://xaoza.net/ 
>          Jabber ID: trejkaz@jabber.zim.net.au
>    GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F  A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73
>
--
Sandy Smith, Senior Programmer
Forum One Communications
<ssmith@forumone.com>
http://www.forumone.com/ 
tel. (703) 548-1855 x28