Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"

From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@iinet.net.au>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:58:10 +1100
Message-ID: <41F304B2.1040909@iinet.net.au>
To: Trejkaz <trejkaz@trypticon.org>
CC: www-html@w3.org

Trejkaz wrote:
> On Sunday 23 January 2005 12:11, you wrote:
> 
>>Trejkaz wrote:
>>
>>>The web server _knows_ that it's Googlebot requesting the
>>>page. Couldn't the web application simply omit the entire comment
>>>section?
>>
>>You, like Google, seem to be forgetting that a lot of legitimate and
>>valuable discussion takes place within blog comments.  Marking comments
>>off in a way that tells a search engine to ignore the content or
>>omitting them entirely is essentially denying their existence.
> 
> RTFA.  It does not involve ignoring the contents of the comment.

If, by "it", you're referring to the Google's nofollow relationship then 
you are correct.  However, I was referring to your suggestion:

   "Couldn't the web application simply omit the entire comment section?"

That is effectively the same as instructing a search engine to ignore an 
entire section, such as the contents of a comment, which would deny the 
ability to search within them.

-- 
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/ 
http://GetFirefox.com/     Rediscover the Web
http://SpreadFirefox.com/    Igniting the Web
Received on Sunday, 23 January 2005 01:58:17 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.