![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"
From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@iinet.net.au>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:58:10 +1100 Message-ID: <41F304B2.1040909@iinet.net.au> To: Trejkaz <trejkaz@trypticon.org> CC: www-html@w3.org Trejkaz wrote: > On Sunday 23 January 2005 12:11, you wrote: > >>Trejkaz wrote: >> >>>The web server _knows_ that it's Googlebot requesting the >>>page. Couldn't the web application simply omit the entire comment >>>section? >> >>You, like Google, seem to be forgetting that a lot of legitimate and >>valuable discussion takes place within blog comments. Marking comments >>off in a way that tells a search engine to ignore the content or >>omitting them entirely is essentially denying their existence. > > RTFA. It does not involve ignoring the contents of the comment. If, by "it", you're referring to the Google's nofollow relationship then you are correct. However, I was referring to your suggestion: "Couldn't the web application simply omit the entire comment section?" That is effectively the same as instructing a search engine to ignore an entire section, such as the contents of a comment, which would deny the ability to search within them. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ http://GetFirefox.com/ Rediscover the Web http://SpreadFirefox.com/ Igniting the WebReceived on Sunday, 23 January 2005 01:58:17 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||