Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"

From: Trejkaz <trejkaz@trypticon.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:37:36 +1100
To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@iinet.net.au>, www-html@w3.org
Message-Id: <200501231237.40235.trejkaz@trypticon.org>
On Sunday 23 January 2005 12:11, you wrote:
> Trejkaz wrote:
> > I'm starting to wonder why this couldn't have been achieved without
> > markup at all.  The web server _knows_ that it's Googlebot requesting the
> > page. Couldn't the web application simply omit the entire comment
> > section?
>
> You, like Google, seem to be forgetting that a lot of legitimate and
> valuable discussion takes place within blog comments.  Marking comments
> off in a way that tells a search engine to ignore the content or
> omitting them entirely is essentially denying their existence.  That is
> harmful because searches would then fail to return those kind of
> results, even though their content may be highly relevent.

RTFA.  It does not involve ignoring the contents of the comment.

TX

-- 
             Email: Trejkaz Xaoza <trejkaz@trypticon.org>
          Web site: http://xaoza.net/ 
         Jabber ID: trejkaz@jabber.zim.net.au
   GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F  A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73

Received on Sunday, 23 January 2005 01:37:32 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.