Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: rel="nofollow" attribute

From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 08:49:39 +0000 (GMT)
Message-Id: <200501220849.j0M8ndE01864@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
To: www-html@w3.org

I wrote:

> I think "nofollow" itself was established from the use in meta elements
> to inhibit all links on the page.  This was a bad choice even there, but

Whilst Google may actually not follow links poisoned with 
rel=nofollow, there is no reason why search engines shouldn't follow
such links in order to build a more complete map of the web, so
this use of nofollow shouldn't have the same meaning as meta-robots-nofollow,
which is another reason why the name is bad.

> 
> If bquote were used properly and only properly, it would probably

I meant blockquote.
Received on Saturday, 22 January 2005 08:50:52 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.