![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: rel="nofollow" attribute
From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 08:49:39 +0000 (GMT) Message-Id: <200501220849.j0M8ndE01864@djwhome.demon.co.uk> To: www-html@w3.org I wrote: > I think "nofollow" itself was established from the use in meta elements > to inhibit all links on the page. This was a bad choice even there, but Whilst Google may actually not follow links poisoned with rel=nofollow, there is no reason why search engines shouldn't follow such links in order to build a more complete map of the web, so this use of nofollow shouldn't have the same meaning as meta-robots-nofollow, which is another reason why the name is bad. > > If bquote were used properly and only properly, it would probably I meant blockquote.Received on Saturday, 22 January 2005 08:50:52 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||