On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:34:03 +0000, Nicholas Chase <nchase@earthlink.net>  
wrote:

> Everybody's focusing on the semantics of "nofollow" as a word, but if  
> you really want to get into it, it IS accurate.

Not at all.

> This is a link whose relationship with the current content is that it not
> related enough that it should be followed.  Period.

Then why do you even need a 'rel' value? Can't you just write out the URI  
of the author in plain text, that is, in no elements or tags at all? Or  
even better; why write out the URI in the first place?

Afaik, Google does not follow links that aren't there. That should solve  
the problem quite nicely.

-- 
Asbjørn Ulsberg     -=|=-    http://virtuelvis.com/quark/ 
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»