Edward Lass wrote:
> Adeel's proposed use really wouldn't require a unique element. Like
> Johannes said, it's something like XInclude. [2]

Or OBJECT. (Since I do not think it is about including XML fragments, is 
it?)


> You know, it's interesting how often this sort of question comes up *
> either embedding document fragments or embedding entire documents into
> (X)HTML.  Sometimes it's seen as other types of includes [3] [4] and
> sometimes it's discussed as a replacement for frames [5].

Again, OBJECT is suited as replacement for frames.


> In Adeel's use case, however, there are some security and intellectual
> property concerns.  Client-side embedding of fragments from different
> sites could make life a little too easy for phishers.

Isn't that already possible using the IFRAME, FRAME or OBJECT element?


-- 
  Anne van Kesteren
  <http://annevankesteren.nl/ >