Le 15 févr. 2005, à 11:52, Tantek Çelik a écrit :
> A test *suite* would be sufficient but not necessary in this case.  
> All that
> would be necessary is are the minimum tests to prove the above 
> statement
> that " the element object is not implemented correctly on any
>  browser I have tried so far" along with a list of such browsers.  A 
> proper
> test suite for object is probably quite a bit more work.

Ok. :)

* Intrinsice size
	http://www.w3.org/QA/2004/02/object/test-case-001.html 

So we can expect that the image will be displayed with its intrinsic 
size unfortunately it's not. Specifically because of

For example on

- Safari 1.2.4 (v125.12)
	not displayed with intrinsic size
- Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.5) 
Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0
	Seems correct
- Opera Version	7.51, Build	1797, Platform	MacOS X
	Seems correct


* Fallback mechanism.
	http://www.w3.org/QA/2004/02/object/test-case-005.html 

When the first object is not available, the fallback mechanism applies 
and the User agent must render the content of the object, which is in 
this case a text.

- Safari 1.2.4 (v125.12)
	display a case with nothing except a file icon
- Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.5) 
Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0
	Display the text which is right
		(but as a bizarre behaviour with regards the CSS of the object which 
is still displayed but without respecting the size of the box.)
- Opera Version	7.51, Build	1797, Platform	MacOS X
	display a big box with the Error page of W3C




-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ 
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***