Quoting David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>:
> (My perception here is that Ann was expressing the false argument for
> XHTML that making all tags non-optional produces a better defined parse
> tree; which basically fails to realise that the tags are implied, even
> though not physically present.)

It's Anne. I'm not sure how tags can ever be implied in XHTML. (Not talking
about the text/html serialization here.)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/ >