![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: <spoiler> element
From: Devin Bayer <devin@freeshell.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 08:41:15 -0800 Message-ID: <439710AB.9040205@freeshell.org> To: Oskar Welzl <lists@welzl.info> CC: Jeremy Rand <jeremy@asofok.org>, www-html@w3.org Oskar Welzl wrote: > > I have to say, though, that HTML always offered the very generic "show > this content only when activated by the user"-element: > <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/links.html#h-12.2 ">Click > here only if you want to read which element it is.</a> > > This is as generic as can be - and as specific as we can allow, > probably. It is not the sophisticated "show within the current > page"-solution you want. It does not fully cover all use cases: > Disturbing medical photos within a scientific text should probably be > shown right within the paragraph that describes them, not on a separate > page. But that would be <show-disturbing-medical-pictures>, not just > <spoiler> ;-) So, basically, the <spoiler> element is already provided with the XLink language and the show="embed" attribute. This is esentialy the equivalent of <a target="inline">. See: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xlink-20010627/#show-att This is much more generic then <spoiler>, which for the most useful applications is incorrectly named. -- Devin BayerReceived on Thursday, 8 December 2005 04:08:01 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||